tracejaks

[coalburner]

whats the point of calling a specific soyjak a "tracejak"?
Wouldn't every soyjak by design be traced or whatever

 

[⸻⸻⸻]

I think it means on what it's traced from like those barely IAS nuvariants people make

 

[coalburner]

I think it means on what it's traced from like those barely IAS nuvariants people make

i guess
but you could just call those NAS or dustjaks
i dont get why its frequently used on the ki' and across the soysphere

 

[Apeson]

Tracejaks have no sovl because anyone with enough time can make them.

 

[coalburner]

Tracejaks have no sovl because anyone with enough time can make them.

thats the beauty of soyjaks
anyone can make them
thats the point chud

 

[Apeson]

thats the beauty of soyjaks
anyone can make them
thats the point chud

You don't get it.

 

[coalburner]

You don't get it.

no you don't

 

[Apeson]

no you don't

Look at these two images and tell me which one looks better.

 

[Keyed zaryan]

Tracejaks more like trashjaks.

 

[⸻⸻⸻]

Guys, what do you think of my nuvariant?

 

[coalburner]

Guys, what do you think of my nuvariant?
View attachment 108334

i like this
its not the most memorable thing ive ever seen but its alright

 

[coalburner]

Look at these two images and tell me which one looks better.
View attachment 108331View attachment 108332

from an "objective" and "artistic" standpoint the first one looks better as it is more detailed and took more time

from an IAS standpoint the second one is better

 

[Apeson]

Gapejak is a tracedjak
Markiplier is a tracedjak
A24 is not a tracedjak
Lets ask ourselves, without bias, what the better looking 'jak is out of the three

Thing is, a tracejak is literally what the name says. Markiplier has a lot of stuff added it that makes it different from the source image, so does gapejak.
Tracejaks are when you just trace over the lines and nothing else, and they tend to look uncanny.

 

[coalburner]

Thing is, a tracejak is literally what the name says. Markiplier has a lot of stuff added it that makes it differenct from the source image, so does gapejak.

but i mean adding glasses and stubble isnt THAT big of a difference

 

[Apeson]

but i mean adding glasses and stubble isnt THAT big of a difference

Wrong, that's not the only thing that's added. And at the same time those two things can make a huge difference if done wrong.

 

[coalburner]

Wrong, that's not the only thing that's added. And at the same time those two things can make a huge difference if done wrong.

i suppose so
also in alot of jak's they are the only thing added
and i haven't seen any jak's where they are done wrong except in some xitter brim off-siter shit.

 

[Apeson]

also in alot of jak's they are the only thing added
and i haven't seen any jak's where they are done wrong

 

[coalburner]

View attachment 108344

 

[⸻⸻⸻]

View attachment 108346

 

[FartmingerFuckwadCheesest]

The real question is how do you make gemmy variants? One can have the ability to draw but not have the ability to create a good variant/subvariant. They might strike once but never again, if they even strike to begin with.