>BITCH DOES I LOOK LIKE A WHITEY 2 YU? SHUTCHO ASS UP BEFO Y SLAP DA SHIT OUTCHU HOE
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts

Religion kill counts DEBUNKED

Attachments

  • cryboymeanwords.png
    cryboymeanwords.png
    60.3 KB · Views: 20
We killed them by forcing soap on them
Christians only killed 200 million KEK we won
>The Great British killing machine
>If one takes Al-Jazeera’s 100 million Bharatiyas casualties in 40 years to be true — there’s no reason not to believe this — it would not be an exaggeration to say that more than 200 million people died or killed under the British rule. And this would be a highly conservative number for the 190 years of British rule between 1757 AD and 1947 AD.
 
Really, the real numbers just reflect how densely populated the areas are where the social unrest was happening.
Also, it's painfully oversimplified to blame an entire catastrophe just one party.
For example: The Chinese population dropped by over 20 million during WW2, but the Japanese only killed a tiny percentage of that (most were starvation victims because they hit the road without bringing any food or supplies with them to flee the advancing army.)
So is it really accurate to say that Shintoism killed 23 million Chinese?
 
Really, the real numbers just reflect how densely populated the areas are where the social unrest was happening.
Also, it's painfully oversimplified to blame an entire catastrophe just one party.
For example: The Chinese population dropped by over 20 million during WW2, but the Japanese only killed a tiny percentage of that (most were starvation victims because they hit the road without bringing any food or supplies with them to flee the advancing army.)
So is it really accurate to say that Shintoism killed 23 million Chinese?
yes
 
These hindus also act like India was a massive fighting ground between Hindus and Muslims. It was more like a battle royale where everyone fought everyone
Same goes with Pre-Reconquista Iberia where you could often see muslims and Christians allying to fight other muslims or Christians
That's just how history is
 
View attachment 42023
View attachment 42024
Wikipedia isn't the most reliable source but this is around the period when pajeets say 400 million hindus got killed by muslims
Historians love throwing around these huge numbers but don't seem to realize that the effects of these events if they were real (like the bubonic plague) are apparent for centuries.
Ireland still hasn't fully recovered from the famine that happened almost 200 years ago, for example.
 
Really, the real numbers just reflect how densely populated the areas are where the social unrest was happening.
Also, it's painfully oversimplified to blame an entire catastrophe just one party.
For example: The Chinese population dropped by over 20 million during WW2, but the Japanese only killed a tiny percentage of that (most were starvation victims because they hit the road without bringing any food or supplies with them to flee the advancing army.)
So is it really accurate to say that Shintoism killed 23 million Chinese?
Assuming the war was even holy or endorsed by shinto in any way in the first place
 
Historians love throwing around these huge numbers but don't seem to realize that the effects of these events if they were real (like the bubonic plague) are apparent for centuries.
Ireland still hasn't fully recovered from the famine that happened almost 200 years ago, for example.
A more recent example is how WW2 still has Russias demographics like 100m people behind what i should've been assuming the same growth with no war
 
Really, the real numbers just reflect how densely populated the areas are where the social unrest was happening.
Also, it's painfully oversimplified to blame an entire catastrophe just one party.
For example: The Chinese population dropped by over 20 million during WW2, but the Japanese only killed a tiny percentage of that (most were starvation victims because they hit the road without bringing any food or supplies with them to flee the advancing army.)
So is it really accurate to say that Shintoism killed 23 million Chinese?
The people who were killed weren’t killed in the name of shintoism either. The invasion was motivated as “self defence” after a false flag, and the reason to stage a false flag and invasion was to get access to chinas natural resources and to increase japanese influence in asia. The soldiers were primarily fighting for nationalist reasons. So I would say it’s completely inaccurate to say that anyone was killed by shintoism during world war 2.
They worshipped the emperor as a God dude what more endorsement do you need other than a God telling you to fight
Japanese soldiers were fighting for their country, not their emperor.
 
Back
Top Bottom