Official Schlog mourning thread

[Onzikin]

With Froot firing all staff, the schlog is left virtually unmoderated, with no jannies left to approve new accounts and most of the active users switching to here. It's a ghost town

 

[jim🅱️o]

the real schlog was the friends we made along the way or however the cookie crumbles

 

[pig]

why is it even still up? wouldn't froot save money by shutting it down?

 

[ザイバツ]

why is it even still up? wouldn't froot save money by shutting it down?

So he can breach everything and sell it to Israel

 

[basil]

i kind of just want it to be shut down ngl

 

[redactedaccount]

Just pull the plug already

 

[XXX_SKIBIDISIGMA_XXX]

Archive the entire schlog then shut it all down.

 

[Onzikin]

>gives up on selling it
>goes to put ads instead
>leaves the site completely unmoderated
>no userbase left to see his ads
What's his plan? Unless he's thinking of banning everyone and restarting the schlog from scratch by trying to attract new users from the sharty

 

[pig]

noob food

 

[Dremora]

It was only good for the first few months anyway.

 

[redactedaccount]

most of the active users switching to here.

Also there are reasons to make the switch. Ultimately, many people on the Schlog wanted a fresh restart and Shroot's vision coincides with what the website wanted to be. There's a reason that towards the end I distanced myself. It wasn't because of a sale or because of any ridiculous drama, but rather it was because everything there had already become stale and ruined by people who I personally disliked and wanted gone before they ruined the website (Meursault). I think there should be a system in place that allows people to host votebans where if there's a 75 percent or higher majority, the user gets banned by community decision.

 

[InaVigilant]

I joined the schlog 1 month ago and it's already dying

 

[Patryk Kornatowski]

Let me say a few things clear...

when I was introduced to the schlog by a certain friend from a certain community via the 'cord, at the time, I only knew about the sharty and soybooru, I just didn't know at the time there was a soyjak forum, but when I signed up, I originally got banned for being underaged (because of the bullshit 18+ rule that was there at the time) and then I got falsely banned a few times by the goddamn thrembolone because he's a dummy for not understanding me enough, and over the course of a few months, i met some friends like terrorbyte, soyteen liker (despite everyone else hating her at the moment), etc, but also I started to understand why froot is a piece of shit... he can't properly run a server, but still, i still witnessed some pretty intresting events like the Race War and DOLL's message from Jimbo's account for example, but sadly all good things must come to end thanks to the orange italian brappa, fuck you froot!


rip soyjak blog

 

[ISTANBUL]

It was only good for the first few months anyway.

Hi, queenie. You're valid, btw

 

[jim🅱️o]

I think there should be a system in place that allows people to host votebans where if there's a 75 percent or higher majority, the user gets banned by community decision.

this is actually a good idea, most unlikable users end up doing fucked up shit later on so a way to exile them like this would be convenient

 

[Cat]

With Froot firing all staff, the schlog is left virtually unmoderated, with no jannies left to approve new accounts and most of the active users switching to here. It's a ghost town

this is actually a good idea, most unlikable users end up doing fucked up shit later on so a way to exile them like this would be convenient

inb4 they add their cord sistas to fuck with votes

 

[redactedaccount]

inb4 they add their cord sistas to fuck with votes

I think a way to steer around this would be for jannies to nominate people to be votebanned. If the person is a homosexual or is just generally disliked or annoying, they should be eligible for a voteban.

 

[ISTANBUL]

I think a way to steer around this would be for jannies to nominate people to be votebanned. If the person is a homosexual or is just generally disliked or annoying, they should be eligible for a voteban.

We should let annoying fuckers roam free if they're not disruptive. They make the site more fun to use.

 

[Onzikin]

I think there should be a system in place that allows people to host votebans where if there's a 75 percent or higher majority, the user gets banned by community decision.

One on hand, this sounds like it'll turn the site into a hivemind circlejerk.
On the other, I understand the sentiment as there are people who genuinely contribute absolutely nothing to the site (*cough Basil *cough) so I understand since irl you can ostracize people from your group for being annoying, so it makes sense to do it online as well

 

[Cat]

I think a way to steer around this would be for jannies to nominate people to be votebanned. If the person is a homosexual or is just generally disliked or annoying, they should be eligible for a voteban.

votebans generally don't work and it doesn't really prevent them from inviting their cord sistas to vote against getting banned