/leftypol/

[Nvtral]

i mean the whole point of it is not being authoritarian right? but no matter which type of government you hold there's always someone who'll be at the top, in this case the politicians or people who manage the property divisions for everyone. also you cant really define private property because there's always a sideloop on why its not personal property. by believing in communism you put all your faith on politicians, id rather be a goyim and put my faith in companies that atleast i know are gonna do something like selling me goods

also the ussr never met food security and china is state-capitalist party who claims to be communist but isnt

 

[XXBHARATKINGINDIAARYANXX]

oh my God! oh my God!

 

[shekel]

i mean the whole point of it is not being authoritarian right? but no matter which type of government you hold there's always someone who'll be at the top, in this case the politicians or people who manage the property divisions for everyone. also you cant really define private property because there's always a sideloop on why its not personal property. by believing in communism you put all your faith on politicians, id rather be a goyim and put my faith in companies that atleast i know are gonna do something like selling me goods

No, communism is explicitly authoritarian, Marx himself said so.

 

[Nvtral]

No, communism is explicitly authoritarian, Marx himself said so.

then whats the point of communism?

 

[revolutionary]

i mean the whole point of it is not being authoritarian right?

stop reading there

 

[revolutionary]

then whats the point of communism?

read the book and then come back

 

[myexdrew]

read the book and then come back

If he starts reading he will disagree with you even more better that this goyim stays illiterate

 

[Apeson]

read the book and then come back

 

[Nvtral]

read the book and then come back

just tell me the point of it, or atleast what do you believe the point on it is

 

[木制的尼尔森]

View attachment 132689

We all reading this

 

[supersage]

read the book and then come back

the book just states humanity is lazy, and does not want to work
aka prime material for manual labour

 

[XXBHARATKINGINDIAARYANXX]

oh my God! oh my God!

 

[revolutionary]

just tell me the point of it, or atleast what do you believe the point on it is

wealth and resources are distributed not based on social status or individual output, but according to what each person requires to live and thrive

 

[XXBHARATKINGINDIAARYANXX]

oh my God! oh my God!

 

[revolutionary]

oh my God! oh my God!

SHUT UP

 

[Nvtral]

the book just states humanity is lazy, and does not want to work
aka prime material for manual labour

watafaaaaaaa

 

[Apeson]

wealth and resources are distributed not based on social status or individual output, but according to what each person requires to live and thrive

I require ten gorillion dollars because I have anxiety otherwise. Sorry but that's all the money in the economy so everyone else is gonna have to live on scraps.

 

[Apeson]

Also I can't work because anxiety or some shit. Sorry.

 

[Nvtral]

wealth and resources are distributed not based on social status or individual output, but according to what each person requires to live and thrive

so try to maximize work for the minimum input? That sounds fascist.

 

[supersage]

wealth and resources are distributed not based on social status or individual output, but according to what each person requires to live and thrive

So the doctor who operates on people's brains, went under 15 years of training is the same as Ivan, the 70iq noob who has only one eye and drinks liquid cow shit on his farm?

Sounds like a load of shit to me, honestly.