tbh better than getting crusaded to death by catholicsTurkiye is the modern day Amalak, they are a constant blight on the Church due to being an enemy of God.
The Crusades were justified and Muslims inflicted it upon themselves by being too violent and dummyed to restrain yourself from attacking Christian pilgrims to the Holy Land.tbh better than getting crusaded to death by catholics
noob saying this as catholics and orthodoxs were friends in middle agesThe Crusades were justified and Muslims inflicted it upon themselves by being too violent and dummyed to restrain yourself from attacking Christian pilgrims to the Holy Land.
Not really but the Ottoman hordes were a significant impairment to Catholic and Orthodox reunification.noob saying this as catholics and orthodoxs were friends in middle ages
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Crusadeno?Not really but the Ottoman hordes were a significant impairment to Catholic and Orthodox reunification.
And what about the first three mr. roach?
they were ok IdkAnd what about the first three mr. roach?
Turkiye (back then the Ottoman empire) is the modern day Amalek because they have been a thorn in the side of Israël (the one holy, catholic, and apostolic church)they were ok Idk
What does this have to do with our topic?
Our topic is "Did the crusades negatively affect byzantine?"Turkiye (back then the Ottoman empire) is the modern day Amalek because they have been a thorn in the side of Israël (the one holy, catholic, and apostolic church)
Yes I'm ESL but you still didn't answer my question also ad hominem because why not