Ban Megathread

[supersage]

That's a slippery slope fallacy, son.

>Having rules and enforcing them is a slippery slope
????

 

[Sloppyjakky`]

We don't because banning people is bad for the pee pee heach
But we also don't want this to become a lawless shithole where you see porn and gore in every thread, as it would remind a certain someone of the old net.

noob shut your bitch ass up we all know that jannies just want to ban people
>But we also don't want this to become a lawless shithole where you see porn and gore in every thread, as it would remind a certain someone of the old net.

Spoiler: gootARYAN gemerald

 

[supersage]

noob shut your bitch ass up we all know that jannies just want to ban people
>But we also don't want this to become a lawless shithole where you see porn and gore in every thread, as it would remind a certain someone of the old net.

Spoiler: gootARYAN gemerald

View attachment 66292

Spoilered and not explicit, also in a thread meant to show brimstone things.

 

[modderola]

>Having rules and enforcing them is a slippery slope
????

You're exaggerating the part about
>If we don't ban someone for showing 6 pixels of a brown ball sack (literally epi) then it will turn into a lawless shithole with porn and gore in every threads

Slippery slope fallacy examples include arguments that a single event will trigger a chain reaction of increasingly negative and improbable events, without sufficient evidence that the chain reaction is likely.

as it would remind a certain someone of the old net.

I assume you're referring to GlueMetropolis, On the shlog as "lawless" as it was, it never had crazy amounts of porn or gore; the worst I saw is a spoilered video of a bad driver eating a rat's head in the shlog and it was posted by an oldcaca onionfarmer

 

[Sloppyjakky`]

Spoilered and not explicit, also in a thread meant to show brimstone things.

>Literal softcore porn is allowed but if you ever dare to post 'cado we are banning your ass for a month

 

[supersage]

You're exaggerating the part about
>If we don't ban someone for showing 6 pixels of a brown ball sack (literally epi) then it will turn into a lawless shithole with porn and gore in every threads

Slippery slope fallacy examples include arguments that a single event will trigger a chain reaction of increasingly negative and improbable events, without sufficient evidence that the chain reaction is likely.

I assume you're referring to GlueMetropolis, On the shlog as "lawless" as it was, it never had crazy amounts of porn or gore; the worst I saw is a spoilered video of a bad driver eating a rat's head in the shlog and it was posted by an oldcaca onionfarmer

Well yes I was obviously exagerating, the schlog wasn't that bad in that regard.
However the site's rules here are very clearly laid out, that no explicit pornography is allowed under any circumstance.
What ricardo showed is in the gray area, it's spoilered and in a thread about brimstone things as such, so it barely passes in that regard, personally I wouldn't allow it but that's just site rules.

 

[modderola]

noob shut your bitch ass up we all know that jannies just want to ban people
>But we also don't want this to become a lawless shithole where you see porn and gore in every thread, as it would remind a certain someone of the old net.

Spoiler: gootARYAN gemerald

View attachment 66292

Yeah, since toniy/thrembo dislike koot, they try to fish out every excuse to ban him temporarily to mess with him (even if that excuse is very weak and obviously done out of spite)

 

[supersage]

>Literal softcore porn is allowed but if you ever dare to post 'cado we are banning your ass for a month
View attachment 66293

Rule 3, Section C: "Things that may be considered NSFW should be spoilered with "NSFW.""

 

[Sloppyjakky`]

it's spoilered and in a thread about brimstone things as such, so it barely passes in that regard, personally I wouldn't allow it but that's just site rules.

So I can post softcore porn on the brimstone thread with a spoiler?

 

[supersage]

Yeah, since toniy/thrembo dislike koot, they try to fish out every excuse to ban him temporarily to mess with him (even if that excuse is very weak and obviously done out of spite)

I dislike him yes, but it's funny to keep him around, as he gives us PPH, a bunch of it.
Even our greatest PPHbvlls get banned if they break the rules, no exceptions.

So I can post softcore porn on the brimstone thread with a spoiler?

If no genitalia is shown, and it's not something like inflation porn or some shit then go ahead, it is a thread about posting brimstone, aslong as it's not a cropped video of someone jerking off etc.

 

[modderola]

However the site's rules here are very clearly laid out, that no explicit pornography is allowed under any circumstance.

I understand banning someone for showing explicit pornography as it's stated in the rules, but Koot didn't exactly show "explicit" pornography if it was cropped. So it sounds like a reach

 

[supersage]

I understand banning someone for showing explicit pornography as it's stated in the rules, but Koot didn't exactly show "explicit" pornography if it was cropped. So it sounds like a reach

You could very clearly, in the video see the top of the man jerking off's penis, numerous times.

 

[modderola]

You could very clearly, in the video see the top of the man jerking off's penis, numerous times.

That's not explicit. For it to be explicit, it should show like full-on or half the genitalia. Nobody's gooning to dreamybulls tip bro

 

[supersage]

That's not explicit. For it to be explicit, it should show like full-on or half the genitalia. Nobody's gooning to dreamybulls tip bro

Even in the context of it being cropped (which it was, albeit badly) it still dosen't excuse it from being explicit, as it was a man jerking off.

 

[Sloppyjakky`]

If no genitalia is shown, and it's not something like inflation porn or some shit then go ahead, it is a thread about posting brimstone, aslong as it's not a cropped video of someone jerking off etc.

oh boy...

 

[Joseph]

Yeah, since toniy/thrembo dislike koot,

nobody likes him

 

[modderola]

nobody likes him

@garf @mcnoob humble him

 

[Bobby Baccalà]

rulecucked

 

[Garf]

nobody likes him

koot won get over it

 

[I seen it on the Internet]

Just saw this funny email today
>If you're willing to ban two respected users for extended periods of time (and one permabanned) over a funny image of someone's asshole, just ban the entire site at this point and everyone else who has ever posted 'cado.


>You literally have a pedophile who bragged about 8th grade girls being attracted to him as an adult as a Moderator, and yet an image of a greasy anus is what you're leaking over.


>Also find it funny how 'cado is punished more severely than normal porn. I'm convinced you're projecting about being a cacaot.


Holy meds on the 2nd line