>While these Soyjacks were originally created by rightist circles such as 4chan and such, they've… changed, a bit. Some people started growing attached to the cartoons and made various edits of the soyjacks in different, weird situations such as dancing, or soyjack edits that seem to be parodying something that doesn't exist, or soyjacks with fruit in their heads. One of such edits is the picture you see of two soyjacks just kind of hanging out with eachother, with no offensive background that I know of.
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts

Pussssssssiessssssssss

Babyjak on the other hand has no "canon" as to how he's supposed to be used. He was just used as a child for the longest time but any other uses were not unreasonable
 
Have they been stated to be underage beforehand?
>always been a child
only so pedos can enjoy themselves?
In my opinion, the person aging them up would have to be a pedo to see a child and think "I'm gonna age them up so the porn I draw is ethical," and they would also be drawing it specifically for people who are attracted to that character (a child) to beat off to.
 
Back
Top Bottom